Linda van der Pal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I would put the translations in an altogether different document > or even a database. Just to keep the clutter out of the view-files. Or > am I missing a point here?
Yes, putting all translations in one document gives some cluttering, but it is a choice which has been made. Normally it is only little text in the definition of the wizards themselves, and in practice it would only be a few languages. Btw, it is silly that optionlist should be present in the wizard xml's at all, because it seems something which should be asked from the 'field type'. Then i18n and so on of optionslist could be done by resource-bundles or so. Now these things have to be implemented more than once (for 'taglib' editors and editwizards seperately). Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
