lets keep on 1 list..
--- Begin Message ---
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 12:12 pm, Jo_irp wrote:
> Hello Kees,
> There is of course time and money needed to make applications open source;
> generic instead of specific. The companies that paid the app, are free to do
> so within their own timeframe. All announcements made, where discussed with
> and approved by the Foundation. All apps will be MPL.
As developer i'm not iterresed in dicator,wiab as a full product
I want to be able to "de krenten uit te pap te halen". It's a simple
If a company anounces something as to te "open-srouce" they should also give the
sources "boter bij de vis"
If a company thinks they should first finish something before relasing they do not
understand with the fundamentals of open source
they are harming the community "ze krijgen een stokje voorgehouden"
And just as daniel said having an application listed on mmbase.org does not nececary
mean it has to be open-source
but then don't say it's open-source.
imho DataMatrix was not open-srouced but dumped on mmbase.org "leuk sausje er over en
over de balk gooien"
>
> -I already answered the question about Didactor several times.
Perhaps it wasn't the answer I was looking for?
The least we can do is to be open as to what you are getting
--- End Message ---
