On May 26, 2004, at 12:56 PM, Rob Vermeulen wrote:


There is of course time and money needed to make applications open source;
generic instead of specific. The companies that paid the app, are free to do
so within their own timeframe. All announcements made, where discussed with
and approved by the Foundation. All apps will be MPL.


I personally think that organization shouldn't announce their product to be open source if they have the intention to make it open source later. The point is that we have to communicate well which MMBase applications exist and who is responsible for the application. Some applications will be the responsibility of the MMBase developers (such as media, editwizards, etc.) the responsibility of the other applications will be by the organization that made them. If they stop to support their application it will be removed from the list. I really think it's not much more complicated then this. And it shouldn't be more complicated.

Rob.


Notice that even if i am the maintainer of the list i didn't put mmbob on it given the logic Rob stated, mmbob is not released yet. when that happendand only then will it make the list its that simple and if i claim its opensource sources will be provided 100%.


Daniel.




Reply via email to