Martijn Houtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The funny thing is that if the filename ends with jsp the coding is ok, but > with any other extension it is not. It may be that for jsp the filename is > treated as un url and otherwise it is treated as a local file. If I replace > the filename by the full url everything works well in all cases.
I don't think the file is treated much differently. In both cases a response-wrapper is used and so on. I think that for a JSP it is clearer what it's encoding is (you must indicate with 'pageEncoding' or 'contentType' @page attributes). Michiel> -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediacentrum 140 H'sum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
