Martijn Houtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are probably right that the ISO-8859-1 encoding should be specified in > the text/xml content-type.
So, tomcat is more right, because I actually though that it was silly (and honestly, still think) > > By the way both the mime type text/xml and application/xml can be used for > xml, see > > http://www.zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC2376/Output/chapter3.html > > I found more information in > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-xhtml-media-types-20020801/ Thanks for the links, I will read them. But I am afraid that precisely obeying them will not make it more usefull. Because if you place static files (.xml files e.g.) you have little influence on the sent headers, unless you can configure your server. An arbitrary xml file can hardly be served by a web-server then. But anyhow, the application/xml and application/xhtml+xml mime-types should be supported by mm:include and mm:content too (which I forgot about until now). Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediacentrum 140 H'sum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
