Jaco de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > >>[X] -1 (NAY), because : > > >I think the auxiliary file must be used implicitely when using 'text' > >because > >then we don't need to document when you need to explicitely use this '@' > >argument, and when not. I do not think the performance-penalty on using a > >file is measured, nor worth the hassle. > > Do I need to make a new vote on this? Or should we consider it a bufix? I > don't think anyone objects to implicitely use the auxiliary file.
I'm not authority on the subject too, but I won't complain if you change it like this as a bugfix. There are a few bugs about this in the bugtracker, which were marked closed, perhaps shouldn't be. Michiel > -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
