> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaco de Groot > > Do I need to make a new vote on this? Or should we consider > it a bufix? I don't > think anyone objects to implicitely use the auxiliary file.
Yet, it is a bugfix provided the functionality is unchanged and the implementation is backward compatible. The modification resolves a known issue and the performance penalty is acceptable. Rob van Maris Technical Consultant Quantiq xmedia & communication solutions Koninginneweg 11-13 1217 KP Hilversum T +31 (0)356257211 M +31 (0)651444006 E [EMAIL PROTECTED] W http://www.quantiq.com
