On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:19:58PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote: > There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that > I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing list?". > While QML is part of Qt, I would like to ask is we could get a > separate mailing list for development of the QML engine and QML APIs. > It seems that it's a different set of people who are interested, and > this more targeted approach will help keep the dev ML relevant - after > the discussions today I have 7 topics I want to start threads about, > but most are for exposing to QML existing C++ APIs and of zero > interest to C++ devs.[...]
To be honest, I am not sure this is a good idea. Part of the problems of the past as well as some of them we still have stem from the fact that QML development was done somehow differently, disconnect from other parts of the Qt world. While this is certainly ok for non-critical add-ons which people can just ignore when don't need it, I don't think it's acceptable for something that's touted as Qt's way forward. Sure, I can subscribe to yet another mailing list without any problem, but a lot of people won't. So the already existing schism is more likely to deepen, instead of being flattened out. So please, no. Nobody here is likely to be appalled by discussing something that's considered a core technology for Qt. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
