On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:13 PM, André Pönitz < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:19:58PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote: > > There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that > > I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing list?". > > While QML is part of Qt, I would like to ask is we could get a > > separate mailing list for development of the QML engine and QML APIs. > > It seems that it's a different set of people who are interested, and > > this more targeted approach will help keep the dev ML relevant - after > > the discussions today I have 7 topics I want to start threads about, > > but most are for exposing to QML existing C++ APIs and of zero > > interest to C++ devs.[...] > > To be honest, I am not sure this is a good idea. Part of the problems of > the past as well as some of them we still have stem from the fact that > QML development was done somehow differently, disconnect from other > parts of the Qt world. > > While this is certainly ok for non-critical add-ons which people can > just ignore when don't need it, I don't think it's acceptable for > something that's touted as Qt's way forward. > > Sure, I can subscribe to yet another mailing list without any > problem, but a lot of people won't. So the already existing > schism is more likely to deepen, instead of being flattened out. > > So please, no. Nobody here is likely to be appalled by discussing > something that's considered a core technology for Qt. > +1 Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
