Okay, I'll send my mails to the main dev list. But there's a lot of stuff to start it with (I'm bringing up a couple of old issues that haven't been discussed on the ML before), so I hope no-one has a small filesize limit on their inbox ;) .
-- Alan Alpert On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Kevin Krammer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday, 2012-12-08, Alan Alpert wrote: > >> It seems that it's a different set of people who are interested, and >> this more targeted approach will help keep the dev ML relevant - after >> the discussions today I have 7 topics I want to start threads about, >> but most are for exposing to QML existing C++ APIs and of zero >> interest to C++ devs. > > Additional to what others already wrote, I think it is important not to > entrench an artificial separation between people working on C++ APIs and > people > wanting to use those APIs in a QML context. > > Any of the topics you are planning to discuss would ideally raise the awarness > of people working on C++ APIs to the needs and requirements non-C++ usage of > their APIs have. Which should ideally lead to them considering those needs > when designing new APIs. > > And lets also keep in mind that requirements for using APIs in QML are often > very much aligned with requirements of using those APIs in a scripting context > or through language bindings. > > Cheers, > Kevin > > -- > ** Qt Developer Conference: http://qtconference.kdab.com/ ** > > Kevin Krammer | [email protected] | Software Engineer > Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company > Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) > KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
