+1 I have seen some people take serious issue with the phrasing; the iOS contributions spring to mind, but many people clearly feel publicly disgraced. On Dec 13, 2012 12:51 PM, "Jenssen Tim" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ________________________________________ > Von: > [email protected][qt-creator-bounces+tim.jenssen= > [email protected]]" im Auftrag von "Cristian Tibirna [ > [email protected]] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2012 18:15 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [Qt-creator] gerrit-speak > > > (Rethoric: should this go to a more generic qt list?) > > > > Hello > > > > (First a side question, is there a more consequent documentation about > the use > > of gerrit?) > > > > Is it only me that finds the "-1" review default message in gerrit rather > > irritating? > > > > "I would prefer that you didn't submit this" > > > > reads to my brain much like "go f*k yourself" without the raw words. > > > > I get all the idea of the automating thing and all, and that machines > have no > > emotion, but, if I don't miss something obvious (this happens to me > though...) > > and if that message is configurable, how about > > > > "This requires more work" > > > > instead? > > +1 > Yes this describes more the workflow how I use that with my colleges. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
