Op 14-12-2012 9:30, Koehne Kai schreef:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Donald Carr
>> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:16 PM
>> To: Jenssen Tim
>> Cc: [email protected]; Cristian Tibirna
>> Subject: Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] gerrit-speak
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I have seen some people take serious issue with the phrasing; the iOS
>> contributions spring to mind, but many people clearly feel publicly 
>> disgraced.
> Oh well, if you already feel offended by this phrasing, I guess you should 
> get a thicker skin ... we've people from very different cultures and with 
> varying English language skills in the community, so you should just take 
> things with a pinch of salt in general.
>
> Anyway, the sentence is from the upstream gerrit project, and it actually 
> describes pretty good what it means, technically:
>
> "you shouldn't submit this" - I don't think this is ready to go in as it is.
> "I would prefer" -  ..but at the same time this isn't a veto, so if another 
> approver thinks differently (with reasons), please go ahead.
>
> If anyone things there are better ways to formulate exactly this, I suggest 
> bringing it up in the gerrit forums.
>
> There's a point though that a lot of people (including me) are using -1 for 
> 'this requires more work', and -2 for 'the patch, or target branch is just 
> wrong, please abandon'. So if the intention of the patch is fine in general, 
> but contains some errors, I myself tend to give -1, though it should maybe be 
> a -2. Anyway, I think everyone giving a -1 or -2 should put an explanation in 
> the comments which explains things, so I haven't yet perceived this as a real 
> issue.
>
> Regards
>
> Kai
>
+1. I really don't see the offending nature of the message, and it is 
quite consise in what it says. "This requires more work" does not imply 
"Please don't commit this (yet)" to me.

André

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to