14.12.2012, 19:49, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]>: > On sexta-feira, 14 de dezembro de 2012 13.57.16, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > >> another reason is that any sane commit policy prescribes atomicity on a >> commit level, so forced grouping of commits isn't much of an advantage. > > Note that "atomicity" here is ambiguous. > > Ossi was referring to "this change must be complete and testable on its own". > > I often read it as "it must be as small as possible" and sometimes my commits > are not testable by themselves.
In my understanding, "small as possible" means "can be cherry-picked on its own" -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
