On sexta-feira, 14 de dezembro de 2012 17.43.55, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > this is a self-contradicting interpretation. a minimal fully functional > change is not splittable (i.e., it's atomic). therefore no part of that > change can legally exist on its own (i.e., satisfy the criterion of > being atomic), as otherwise the complete change would not be atomic to > start with.
Again, it's a question of how you define "atomic". I don't include the criterion of being testable. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
