>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:32:09PM +0000, Koehne Kai wrote: >>> Parts of the packaging process is in gerrit (namely qtsdk/qtsdk.git), >> >>> so he should be really be able to stage things :) >>> >> uh, wtf?! nothing against iikka specifically (couldn't judge it), but this >> is so >> totally *not* a reason to make someone an approver. in areas where no >> approvers typically operate (mostly playground projects), we create special- >> purpose groups where the involved people have the rights they need to get >> the work done. approver status is supposed to be earned by displaying >> reasonably universal competence within the project, not being the only guy >> available to check +2 in a particular area. > > I guess giving Iikka local approver privileges for qtsdk.git would cut it, > too. Anyhow, you might then start to wonder whether anyone who's an approver > for qt-creator necessarily needs approver rights for qtwebkit, qt-creator etc > ... I think it's reasonable to expect that people exercise their approver > rights with care, and only use it were appropriate.
just to make it clear .. this is not by any means the reason for the nomination. qtsdk/qtsdk.git has its own group since it was created https://codereview.qt-project.org/#admin,project,qtsdk/qtsdk,access Cheers, -- Sergio Ahumada Release Engineer - Digia, Qt _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
