On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:15:33PM +0100, Simon Hausmann wrote: > Ossi, does it make more sense if the skill we are talking about here > is the ability to tell whether a change in their area of expertise is > correct or not, with a probability of correctness high enough to bring > the project forward? > > Isn't that the skill that an approver has over a regular contributor? > of course it is. but it is not the only skill. a contribution may be technically as correct as it gets, but if the contributor lives in his tiny world without ever having looked outside, there is a good chance he will miss some of the more subtle aspects of doing a proper review. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver Koehne Kai
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as appro... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as a... Koehne Kai
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund ... Sergio Ahumada
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund ... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Ekl... Jedrzej Nowacki
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikk... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as a... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund ... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Ekl... Simon Hausmann
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikk... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Nominating ... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Nominating ... Knoll Lars
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver Anttila Janne
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver Jenssen Tim
- Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as appro... Sergio Ahumada
