On 01/31/2013 07:49 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:59:17PM +0100, Paul Olav Tvete wrote: >> On Thursday 31 January 2013 13:08:11 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >>> as i stated before, i'm driving forward a process to decide the >>> execution details of a previously made decision. >> Since this decision process has been unnoticed by the people I have asked: >> Would you mind giving a reference to where this was discussed? >> > the thread i could find is > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.opengov/257 > there was clearly support and not a single dissent. if you raise > objections now, it must be considered re-visiting a made decision. you > should bring real arguments to the table then, ones which i did not > rebut already.
Policies like this should be recorded in the qt-project.org wiki. This will come up again, and it's unreasonable to expect someone to find, read, and understand the conclusion of a mailing list discussion when a few sentences in a central location will suffice. The wiki could probably use some house keeping. Jeremy _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
