On domingo, 24 de fevereiro de 2013 06.43.24, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > Getting back to the topic of these releases - what is our decision? > > Shall we do the RC2 as proposed, but with shmget fix in 4.7.6, and later go > to release unless problems are found? This would mean we accept that there > is not perfect history available and that we trust the way changes were > cherry-picked to 4.6.4 and 4.7.5. > > Or shall we leave the history as it is and not release these?
I think that the contents that you were proposing to release are *probably* fine, provided that we add the shmget fix. However, I can't be sure because the diff between the two branches is unreviewable, since every header is modified. Someone needs to produce a clean diff we can review and post to the list. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
