On Tuesday 26 February 2013 10:22:27 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 24 de fevereiro de 2013 09.34.43, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> The backport of 8afc6773067bb878020c29b3bebfe8662e3fbfdd (as > 2fd21f04d23d5dd87ca0f6db238ae268492f5528) to add support for signed char as > a metatype is dubious. It's a behaviour change, but it might be one that's > acceptable in a patch release to fix a bug. Olivier, can you give me your > opinion? The change is yours. That change was made in August 2010, before the release of Qt 4.7. It was not submited in the stable branch because 4.7 was already feature frozen, and that fix is not a regression, and not critical. My opinion is that Qt 4.7 is old and I don't really care about it at this point. If someone want bug fixes, they should get the latest Qt 4.8.x instead. /me remembers a joke he did in the Nokia's dev mailinglist proposing to merge the master branch (4.8) into Qt 4.7.4 as Qt 4.7.4 was getting more and more features. -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com - http://code.woboq.org _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development