On quinta-feira, 1 de agosto de 2013 17:57:03, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Hausmann Simon 
<[email protected]>wrote:
> >  What is the advantage of this approach over static linkage?
> 
> 1) Not linking into more applications running.
> 
> 2) It is also safer for the LGPLv2 license without an exception for static
> linking into commercial code.
> 
> 3) shared library is more widely used so it is more natural for me.

Advantages 1 and 3 make no difference because you'll be building it on your 
own. There will be no sharing of code at runtime. In fact, deploying a shared 
library may also make packaging your application more (not less) difficult.
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to