On 2 August 2013 09:42, Sletta Gunnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The audience may not need it, but I would. :-) "less pressing" means it > is not high priority for you, but contribution is welcome? > > 1 makes it possible for anyone to do 2-4 outside of Qt, and unless there > are convincing arguments why they should be there in Qt, I don't think they > should be there. > I really hope this is not equivalent to that only QtQuick/QML is meant to be supported in the Qt Project. We still have QtWidgets maintained inside the Qt Project for good. I really hope the good old way of developing applications with C++ without the QML interpretation and higher layers will still be available.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
