On quinta-feira, 1 de agosto de 2013 20:21:23, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Thiago Macieira > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > On quinta-feira, 1 de agosto de 2013 19:38:12, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > 3 > > > > This discussion is going off on a tangent but... > > > > you do realise that there's an overhead associated with dynamic libraries, > > right? The code runs slightly slower due to indirect access to functons > > and > > data, and there's a start-time impact due to the relocation and dynamic > > linking. Even if you use prelink, the problems do not go away completely. > > Startup time is no concern in our product.
I did mention runtime performance impact too due to -fPIC. All architectures (except IA-64[*]) are affected. Please take the time to investigate a single statically-linked executable. [*] only because -fPIC is mandatory on IA-64, even for executables. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
