On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 19:48:53 +0000 Knoll Lars <[email protected]> wrote
> So then there are basically two options: > > 1. We extend QScopedPointer and live with the fact that the name is not > perfect, as scoping can be broken explicitly. > 2. We add a QUniquePointer that has pretty much the functionality that we > now have in QScopedPointer, and we revert the change that added moving to > QScopedPointer > 3. We revert the patch, and hope that C++11 spreads fast enough so that > people will start using unique_ptr instead. Then we deprecate > QScopedPointer. You also can typedef QScopedPointer QUniquePointer; and deprecate the former name. Cheers, Janusz _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
