On 9/5/13 2:00 AM, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On quarta-feira, 4 de setembro de 2013 22:37:55, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> On 4 September 2013 22:15, Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: >> > When there is a >> > need for QUniquePointer in the future, it is added. >> >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,64686 :-D > >We should add QUniquePointer only when we find the need for it in Qt >code, >which by our rules cannot depend on the C++11 standard library features. I don't think we have that need right now. And I believe that we can start demanding C++11 in a year or two from now. > >We should not provide it for third-party code, tell them to put pressure >on >their vendors to provide std::unique_ptr. Let's not duplicate the C++11 >standard library in Qt. Agree with Thiago. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
