On quarta-feira, 4 de setembro de 2013 22:37:55, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 4 September 2013 22:15, Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > When there is a > > need for QUniquePointer in the future, it is added. > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,64686 :-D
We should add QUniquePointer only when we find the need for it in Qt code, which by our rules cannot depend on the C++11 standard library features. We should not provide it for third-party code, tell them to put pressure on their vendors to provide std::unique_ptr. Let's not duplicate the C++11 standard library in Qt. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
