On terça-feira, 22 de outubro de 2013 14:08:28, Martin Smith wrote: > > actually, I think that he shouldn't go through this process since he was > > a Nokia employee before Open Governance was in place, so he should have > > been added before the Open Governance launch. If that was not the case, > > then it was a mistake. > > I think that might apply to everyone on the doc team.
+1 to Topi. Anyone who has been working in those two years probably deserves to be an approver with the current rules, without having to resort to the old grandfathering. Otherwise, if in those two years someone has not participated in the Qt Project, the grandfathering should really not be used. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
