On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > On terça-feira, 22 de outubro de 2013 14:08:28, Martin Smith wrote: >> > actually, I think that he shouldn't go through this process since he was >> > a Nokia employee before Open Governance was in place, so he should have >> > been added before the Open Governance launch. If that was not the case, >> > then it was a mistake. >> >> I think that might apply to everyone on the doc team. > > +1 to Topi.
+1 for Topi, I've liked his work on the qtdeclarative examples and docs. > Anyone who has been working in those two years probably deserves to be an > approver with the current rules, without having to resort to the old > grandfathering. Otherwise, if in those two years someone has not participated > in the Qt Project, the grandfathering should really not be used. +1, we have a good process and it seems to be working fine in this case. -- Alan Alpert _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
