On quinta-feira, 24 de outubro de 2013 13:46:39, Koehne Kai wrote: > I just asked, it seems not to be possible: > http://www.marshut.com/yiqmk/can-apps-ship-their-own-copy-of-libudev.html > > > So we're back to either moving the libudev dependency to a plugin that > qtserialport tries to load (huh), we live with the fact that qtserialport > won't work on some distributions, or we compile it unconditionally without > libudev support. I don't mind either way ...
Ok, thanks Kai That answers the part about shipping (static or dynamic). So the only option is dynamic loading (ugh) or skipping support entirely (also ugh). PS: None of the systemd developers were in my binary compatibility session yesterday here at LinuxCon. PPS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjRAKuis7T8 @ 16:55 "people have heard my complaints about the fact that the Linux desktop is this morass of infighting and people who do bad things" "I do hope that the desktop people would just try to work together and work more on the technology" Linus started complaining about the problems on the userspace *because* of udev. See https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/303. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development