On terça-feira, 5 de novembro de 2013 10:51:54, Nowacki Jedrzej wrote: > I looked into qmetatype.h. There is a lot of new symbols most of them hidden > in a private namspace. None symbol was removed. I believe BC is fine.
The library BC might be fine. The question is to verify whether the metatype subsystem is still backwards compatible. Question: - if the same type was registered twice and one of the builds was with different compile options or an older version of qmetatype.h, will it still work? No qFatal, both sides can still work? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
