IIRC it wasn't even compiled into the QtWidgets library, although the documentation and everything existed, those symbols were never in Qt. Morten can say 100% at least but that is my understanding and recollection at least.
Andy From: development-bounces+andy.shaw=digia....@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+andy.shaw=digia....@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Jake Petroules Sent: 5. november 2013 19:10 To: Thiago Macieira Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 header diff: QtWidgets On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com<mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com>> wrote: On terça-feira, 5 de novembro de 2013 12:39:55, Jake Petroules wrote: On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com<mailto:marc.m...@kdab.com>> wrote: But can be overloaded on the new types, right. Does this 100% NEED to be reverted? It wasn't even functional until 5.2 IIRC. I really hope this does not have to wait until 6.0, it was a great improvement in usability. We didn't say revert. But we need to restore BC. Unless, of course, you tell us that no one could possibly have been using this because it was so broken. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com<http://intel.com> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org<mailto:Development@qt-project.org> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development Morten merged the port of QMacCocoaViewContainer and QMacNativeWidget to dev on 23 Sept. Prior to that it was unusable. -- Jake Petroules Chief Technology Officer Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com<http://www.petroules.com> Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com<mailto:jake.petrou...@petroules.com>
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
