On terça-feira, 5 de novembro de 2013 12:39:55, Jake Petroules wrote: > On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Marc Mutz <[email protected]> wrote: > > But can be overloaded on the new types, right. > > Does this 100% NEED to be reverted? It wasn't even functional until 5.2 > IIRC. > > I really hope this does not have to wait until 6.0, it was a great > improvement in usability.
We didn't say revert. But we need to restore BC. Unless, of course, you tell us that no one could possibly have been using this because it was so broken. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
