On Sunday 03 August 2014 00:08:28 Gunnar Roth wrote: > > Am 02.08.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Thiago Macieira > > <[email protected]>: > > > > > > And to be honest, while convenient, this is not a must-have feature. With > > my OSS hat on, I would say (L)GPL-averse customers could be served right > > by their aversion by having one fewer solution. > > As someone who has a qt commercial license for some years now and advocated > the use of qt commercial internally, so we have bought nearly about some > dozen licenses, this is interesting to hear , what kind of appreciation we > get for paying thousands of euros each year. Nice…no so.
Please keep in mind that a) Thiago expressed his personal opinion, clearly marked with the "OSS hat on", and b) there is nothing preventing you from using a KDE framework in a commercial environment, as all frameworks are LGPL licensed. Bye -- Milian Wolff | [email protected] | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
