Hi, sorry my comment has no relation to KArchive in special, I appreciate our efforts. I was the attitude which let me maybe overreact. We could as well switch to LGPL and save a lot of money. Never mind, Gunnar
> Am 04.08.2014 um 01:02 schrieb Aleix Pol <[email protected]>: > > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Gunnar Roth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 02.08.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>: >> >> >> And to be honest, while convenient, this is not a must-have feature. With my >> OSS hat on, I would say (L)GPL-averse customers could be served right by >> their >> aversion by having one fewer solution. >> -- > As someone who has a qt commercial license for some years now and advocated > the use of qt commercial internally, > so we have bought nearly about some dozen licenses, this is interesting to > hear , what kind of appreciation we get for paying thousands of euros each > year. Nice…no so. > > regards, > Gunnar > > Hi Gunnar, > KDE has made a huge effort to make sure any Qt user can take advantage of > KArchive. We are very interested in having it used in very different > projects, from open and closed-source nature. If there's any thought against, > I'll be happy to know, because I don't understand. > > Regards, > Aleix >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
