On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Gunnar Roth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Am 02.08.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Thiago Macieira <[email protected] > >: > > > And to be honest, while convenient, this is not a must-have feature. With > my > OSS hat on, I would say (L)GPL-averse customers could be served right by > their > aversion by having one fewer solution. > -- > > As someone who has a qt commercial license for some years now and > advocated the use of qt commercial internally, > so we have bought nearly about some dozen licenses, this is interesting to > hear , what kind of appreciation we get for paying thousands of euros each > year. Nice…no so. > > regards, > Gunnar > Hi Gunnar, KDE has made a huge effort to make sure any Qt user can take advantage of KArchive. We are very interested in having it used in very different projects, from open and closed-source nature. If there's any thought against, I'll be happy to know, because I don't understand. Regards, Aleix
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
