On Monday 19 January 2015 15:18:41 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Distributors are going a great job creating Qt packages. But not everyone > > is using their distro's Qt. In fact, looking at our customers I'd say that > > most of them have their own Qt install somewhere on their disk. Possible > > several installations even. Renamed binaries won't cope with that variety. > > Our product relies on a --with-qmake switch or PATH for selection. Version > > detections follows wherever named. Renamed binaries won't help. Or even > > make our life harder as it needs to be. > > If we are going to focus *just* on customers, yes, you might be right. > > But as far as I understand this is not just about customers, but also about > users. And believe me, we have plenty of those
I'm not sure I see the distinction between users and customers here. When you say "users", are you thinking of a person who builds a Qt-using software from a 3rdparty? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
