On Monday 19 January 2015 20:23:30 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 00:47:50 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > I think there is a point which we might be missing in this long thread. > > For > > Qt5 we are not asking for a simple rename because that *would* break stuff > > for other people, and that's not fair. What we ask is *adding* an > > executable with a suffixed -qt5, be it as a symlink where the OS allows it > > or as copy of the executable if there is no other way out. > > You're forgetting the documentation. It's not just adding the symlink or new > binary. We have to tell people that this is what they should use. > > If we're going to do this, we should do it for ALL operating systems and all > builds, plus adapt Qt Creator.
Yes, I do agree is not a simple task. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
