On Monday 19 January 2015 18:44:14 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:06:45 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > If I'm wrong then simply unmasking qdbus with qtchooser should be enough. > > /usr/bin/qdbus should be provided by the default version (qt4's one in our > > case) and we might even let qt5-qdbus depend upon it's qt4 version, so > > packages depending on it would get both for the time being. > > > > If I'm *not* wrong then I have no other choice but to tell qt5-apps' > > maintainers to patch their software to call qdbus with the -qt5 parameter. > > And we can't even upstream those patches because on platforms other than > > Linux there is no qtchooser available, and most of the tools will fail > > saying a wrong parameter has been issued. So we have no other option than > > to keep a delta from upstream. > > qdbus should be the same in all versions. I don't plan on making breaking > changes in the future -- I can't see what I could do to create such > problems...
I just wrote an example in another mail, supposing a feature is added. We might argue that the same could be said for assistant, but at least that one is fairly obvious to spot ;) -- The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. http://www.devtopics.com/best-programming-jokes/ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
