On Tuesday 20 January 2015 00:57:55 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > qdbus should be the same in all versions. I don't plan on making breaking > > changes in the future -- I can't see what I could do to create such > > problems... > > I just wrote an example in another mail, supposing a feature is added. > > We might argue that the same could be said for assistant, but at least that > one is fairly obvious to spot ;)
Indeed, applications wouldn't be able to depend on the new feature because "qdbus" would be the old, Qt 4 version. Which is why I think the solution of having some binaries be declared "user applications" and the other "non-user-facing tools" was superior. But it's not the solution we went for. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
