On Monday 19 January 2015 20:14:33 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 00:57:55 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > qdbus should be the same in all versions. I don't plan on making > > > breaking > > > changes in the future -- I can't see what I could do to create such > > > problems... > > > > I just wrote an example in another mail, supposing a feature is added. > > > > We might argue that the same could be said for assistant, but at least > > that > > one is fairly obvious to spot ;) > > Indeed, applications wouldn't be able to depend on the new feature because > "qdbus" would be the old, Qt 4 version. > > Which is why I think the solution of having some binaries be declared "user > applications" and the other "non-user-facing tools" was superior. But it's > not the solution we went for.
But maybe now with two years of experience is a subject we need to reopen. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
