On Tuesday 26 May 2015 17:40:05 Viironen Kalle wrote: > On 26/05/15 19:42, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >On Tuesday 26 May 2015 15:19:26 Hausmann Simon wrote: > > > >>Good point :) > >>I was under the assumption that the concepts are too different, but if > >>they > >>aren't then maybe a joint module would make sense. > > > > > >At the very least it's a superset and QtSerialPort (the library) should > >be > >moved into the new module. It's just two classes anyway. > > > I fully agree. At some point QtSerialPort should be moved under this new > module. Problem with QtSerialPort is that it’s so tightly tied into RS-232 > functionality that its extension to support other serial buses isn’t > feasible.
Fair enough. Can you give an overview of what classes you'd like to have and how QSerialPort and QSerialPortInfo would fit into the naming scheme? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
