On Thursday, June 11, 2015 12:29:10 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:32:07PM +0000, Hausmann Simon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Ok :) let's try with reduced qmake syntax (just variables, no functions). > > We can still fall back to json if it's too clumsy. > as you can "parse anything", what's wrong with parsing the function > calls from qt.pro? they match a pretty simple regexp ...
Nothing is wrong with that. In fact that's a great idea :) So how about we place a dependencies.pri into the top-level directory of each module that contains just that one addModule(...) function call? Then qt.pro can just include whatever is there, the CI can simply parse it and - this is different to today's status - the module dependencies are tracked within the module instead of in the external qt5.git. Simon _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
