On Tuesday 21 July 2015 16:00:45 Takao Fujiwara wrote: > > We don't develop gtk. We do develop Qt4 and we know that supporting > > complex > > input methods with it was a pain and it often regressed due to lack of > > testing. I think limiting the testing is doing a disservice to our users. > > However I guess you won't complete IBus testings since there are various > functionalities by languages.
So you're saying that the Qt testing isn't enough, but IBus itself could test more? That is, if the Qt IBus plugin lives as part of IBus, it will get better development and better testing than it does today inside the Qt sources? (just asking, I'm not passing judgement) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
