On Wednesday 22 July 2015 21:15:18 Knoll Lars wrote: > >I don't see how that is a problem. If that were a problem, you wouldn't be > >able to ship additional, commercial-only modules or allow installation of > >MinGW. So clearly the installer is allowed to install non-Qt things too. > > > >What am I missing? > > MingW is an additional tool, not something our customers ship. 3rd party > code inside our libraries is also something we can do if it's a free enough > license (MIT/BSD/X11), but we can't shouldn't add LGPL code there without > consent from the KDE Free Qt Foundation.
I see, that makes perfect sense. So the IBus plugin needs to either be more permissively (non-copyleft) licensed or it needs to be provided to The Qt Company under the terms of the CLA. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
