On 07/22/15 00:49, Thiago Macieira-san wrote: > On Tuesday 21 July 2015 16:00:45 Takao Fujiwara wrote: >>> We don't develop gtk. We do develop Qt4 and we know that supporting >>> complex >>> input methods with it was a pain and it often regressed due to lack of >>> testing. I think limiting the testing is doing a disservice to our users. >> >> However I guess you won't complete IBus testings since there are various >> functionalities by languages. > > So you're saying that the Qt testing isn't enough, but IBus itself could test > more? That is, if the Qt IBus plugin lives as part of IBus, it will get better > development and better testing than it does today inside the Qt sources?
Yes, I think it's better to develop and test the IBus plugin together on ibus-qt. qtbase is a big source tree to develop the plugin. > > (just asking, I'm not passing judgement) > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
