On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 06:36:07 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote: > Keeping 5.9.0 on schedule even while 5.8.0 blows past its planned release > date would seem to be appropriate when you have the capability to > concurrently maintain two minor (not patchlevel) release branches.
That's exactly what Tuukka proposed we do. We keep 5.9.0 on schedule and, because of that, 5.8.1 becomes impossible and unnecessary. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
