On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 11:49:28 PST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 18.02.2017, 22:13, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]>: > > On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 06:36:07 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote: > >> Keeping 5.9.0 on schedule even while 5.8.0 blows past its planned > >> release > >> date would seem to be appropriate when you have the capability to > >> concurrently maintain two minor (not patchlevel) release branches. > > > > That's exactly what Tuukka proposed we do. We keep 5.9.0 on schedule and, > > because of that, 5.8.1 becomes impossible and unnecessary. > > So people who cannot upgrade to 5.8.0 because of bugs would have to wait for > 5.9.0 and hope that there will be no other regressions. Great.
Or wait for 5.9.1. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
