>On 18/02/2017, 21.40, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" 
><[email protected] on behalf of 
>[email protected]> wrote:
>
>    On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 12:11:53 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote:
>    > On 18 February 2017 at 19:13, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>
>    > My point was that this decision happened already on 29 November. That was
>    > the original planned release date for 5.8.0, and also the day on which 
> the
>    > 5.9.0 initial schedule was set. Could it have been predicted at that time
>    > what the consequences might be for 5.8.1?
>    
>    Hindsight is 20/20. Let's not rehash coulda-woulda-shoulda.
>    
>    The question is only what to do now.
    
What I hope we can do is to have everyone helping to get Qt 5.9.0 out as soon 
as possible and then make also 5.9.1 soon (although I think we do need to make 
5.6.3 in between).

If we can have the extra help proposed by KDAB and others in the community for 
making Qt 5.8.1 release geared towards making Qt 5.9 we will be able to make it 
faster and with higher quality than otherwise possible. 

One concrete item is manual testing of our various snapshots. The sooner these 
are fully tested, the better. We have CI and RTA test automation, but these do 
not cover every aspect. Manual testing is needed as well. Often it is a case 
that a bug is found in quite late release steps, but has actually been there 
for some time already. Another way to help is making good bug reports that are 
also notified to the release team. The better the description of the issue, the 
easier it is to fix it. Third item is of course fixing things quickly – by 
having more people fixing the issues identified we will be able to close them 
sooner and thus proceed faster. 

For the CI stability most important thing is to reduce the amount of flaky test 
cases, which cause failures in CI runs. This in turn both adds delay as well as 
increases the load of the CI. 

Yours,

                Tuukka

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to