Does that mean that QList would simply be a C++11 template alias for QVector?
On 18.03.2017 19:15, Thiago Macieira wrote: > But as time went by, I don't think that hybrid approach is valid. A vector is > simply much better. For Qt 6, I'd like QVector and QList to be the same type > -- possibly even interchangeable, so that code that began using QVector in > Qt 5 will be able to "return" QList. -- --- Michael Winkelmann Qt Advisor The Qt Company GmbH Rudower Chaussee 13 D-12489 Berlin [email protected] +4915122973404 http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B --- _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
