On 07/21/2017 02:10 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote:
So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am proposing (BB++ -> C++ ->
WebAssembly) is a good plan.
What does this have to do with Qt?
For a web engine I don't think it's possible to swap the Javascript
engine entirely but it is possible to introduce the BB++ -> C++ ->
WebAssembly sequence.
For the QML / Javascript dual then it could be replaced by with the QML
/ BB++ dual and, which harness the power of C++14 and Root.Ptr and we
can just let the compiler do the hard work.
Thanks,
-Phil
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
