On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Phil Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/21/2017 02:10 AM, Lorn Potter wrote: > >> >> On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am proposing (BB++ -> C++ -> >>> WebAssembly) is a good plan. >>> >> >> What does this have to do with Qt? >> > > For a web engine I don't think it's possible to swap the Javascript engine > entirely but it is possible to introduce the BB++ -> C++ -> WebAssembly > sequence. > > For the QML / Javascript dual then it could be replaced by with the QML / > BB++ dual and, which harness the power of C++14 and Root.Ptr and we can > just let the compiler do the hard work. > Does this mean that you can turn QML to C++ code and compile just C++ code? If so, wouldn't this render Qt Quick Compiler <http://doc.qt.io/QtQuickCompiler/> obsolete? Cheers, Cristian.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
